
***
The interpretive summaries go beyond a mere summary of each of Lamdan's entries and also offer analysis of what is being said. You can follow the interpretive summaries for Diary 4 below, or you can return to the overview, translations, or concise summaries of the diary entries.
Interpretive Summaries for Diary 1 (June - September 1914) | Diary 2 (July 1915 - March 1916) | Diary 3 (November 1916 - May 1917) | Diary 4 (January 1919 - December 1919) (below)
January 1919 (Lutsk)
early January 1919
| January 19, 1919
| January 25, 1919
February 1919 (Lutsk)
February 2, 1919
| February 9, 1919
***
Yitzhak’s first diary entry in January 1919 begins mid-sentence. The previous page or two of the notebook, along with its cover, is missing. In what remains of his first entry, Yitzhak rails against accursed and despised traitors who care more for one principle of Marxist doctrine than the entire life of “the people.” Though Yitzhak does not explicitly identify these traitors “who call themselves socialists,” his language strongly suggests he is referring to the Jewish socialists. Their absorption in and debates over Marxist doctrine exacerbate the fragmentation of the Jewish community and its inability to respond collectively to its attackers. When the “robber comes to rob and the murderer comes to kill,” Yitzhak writes, the attacker encounters a scattered flock, going in different directions. Yitzhak blames this lack of cohesion in part on socialist debate among Jews, though his language also suggests contempt for intellectual hairsplitting itself at such a moment:
finds people standing and arguing, debating and splitting hairs. One pulls this way and one pulls that way. Yes, in a terrible hour such as this, sitting and discussing futile questions, arguing and discussing the Marx doctrine – and all around ruins and destruction, the whip lashes, the bullets fly towards the Jewish heart, and these people stand and proclaim: how fine, how fitting, this is the way of socialism, this is revolution, all around screams of savages thirsting for blood, but only for Jewish blood, and here a base and contemptible groveling before the socialist idol, as it were—that idol on whose account these troubles have come upon us.
Yitzhak is here accusing Jews who embrace socialism of fragmenting the Jewish community and thereby undermining the solidarity that might enable it to confront its real enemies. Those enemies remain unidentified in this surviving entry, although he was writing amid the armed upheaval surrounding Lutsk and may well have had the forces that had recently taken control of the city particularly in mind. Compared with the largely aesthetic and personal reservations about socialism that Yitzhak expressed a year and a half earlier, on May 8 1917, his criticism here is far more trenchant and pragmatic. Socialism, as he now sees it, no longer merely undervalues national distinctiveness; its doctrine and disputes have harmful consequences, preventing Jews from unifying in the face of immediate danger.
In tone and substance, Yitzhak appears to express a Zionist critique: The Jews are being attacked as Jews, yet socialist doctrine is dividing them at the very moment when, in Yitzhak’s view, they need to respond as one people. His complaint appears to be not only that Jews are quarreling over socialism, but that the substance of the doctrine itself may be undermining the national solidarity he believes the crisis demands. It is therefore striking that near the end of the entry Yitzhak’s heart “yearns for the East,” echoing the language of the medieval Jewish poet Yehuda Halevi, whom Yitzhak had explicitly quoted in earlier diaries. The Land of Israel becomes the alternative to the condition he has just described: that one corner of the world where, he writes, a Jew can feel “like a man of worth, as a man among men,” rather than “like a sheep among wolves or a fly in coarse hands.”
Read the translation of early January 1919 or return to the top of the page.
***
Yitzhak records this brief entry while he confined himself to his room for safety. Word had reached him in the morning that soldiers were seizing every Jew they found in the streets for labor. Yitzhak reports that all the stores were closed that day and the city seemed dead, hardly surprising given that Jews constituted the largest ethnic group in Lutsk. Exact population figures are not available for 1919. But in 1921, when a formal census was conducted, there were approximately 21,000 residents in Lutsk, of whom approximately 14,800, or about 70 percent, were Jews.*
In addition to seizing Jews, the soldiers also imposed a military tax on the city and threatened to kill the leaders of the Jewish community if the money was not raised by the deadline. Yitzhak does not here identify the soldiers carrying out these orders. They were probably Ukrainian troops belonging to forces of the Ukrainian People’s Republic. Detachments under the command of Symon Petliura had entered Lutsk on December 20, 1918.*
This arrival in Lutsk formed part of the uprising against the German-backed regime, the Hetmanate of Pavlo Skoropadskyi. By mid-December 1918, forces ousted the Hetmanate and reestablished the Ukrainian People’s Republic (UNR). In January 1919, Lutsk was therefore under UPR control. Petliura’s army, however, was far from a cohesive regular force. It included reorganized former Imperial Russian Army units, volunteer detachments, and insurgent units, and suffered from weak organization, uneven discipline, and fragmented command. Whether the troops were carrying out an authorized military command or acting on their own initiative cannot be determined from Yitzhak’s account.
Read the translation of January 19, 1919 or return to the top of the page.
*
See "Lutsk," Encylopedia.com, for date Petliura's troops entered Lutsk. For census statistics in 1921, see Lutsk City Council. "Historical Reference about Lutsk." Official Website of Lutsk City Council. https://www.lutskrada.gov.ua/en/pages/history-city. For general discussions, see Serhy Yekelchyk, Ukraine: Birth of a Modern Nation, especially chapter 4. See also the useful “Ukraine in the Flames: 1917 in Kyiv" by Serhii Plokhii. https://www.huri.harvard.edu/news/ukraine-flames-1917-kyiv-serhii-plokhii Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. For a discussion of Jews and Ukrainian interactions in this period, see Henry Abramson, Ukrainians and Jews in Revolutionary Times, 1917-1920: A Prayer for the Government.
***
Yitzhak describes feelings of fear and terror especially as a Jew living in Lutsk in the current situation which he compares to a volcano ready to erupt. The Jews are caught in the middle “the target of all arrows and murderous hands on all sides.” No one will stand up for the Jews. In a dizzying series of metaphors, some with biblical or rabbinic resonances, Yitzhak describes the Jews as the scapegoat sent to Azazel, a pot that falls on a stone or vice versa, and a flock of sheep that scatters. He has used such metaphors before to describe the experience of Jews in Exile, in galut (see Aug. 23, 1914), and here they again reflect his Zionist critique of Jewish life in exile: a people scattered, vulnerable, and unable to act collectively. Here Yitzhak doesn’t mince words when he talks about the inability of the Jewish community to discipline itself and organize a response. “Oh, your people is but a flock, a scattered people, a nation of gibberish and chatter…” Instead of rallying as a community, everyone is focused on personal concerns. Quoting the poet of the Haskalah, Yehudah Leib Gordon, Yitzhak brings his critique to a point: the Jews are “not a people, not a community, just a flock.”
Shifting to his own personal situation, Yitzhak indicates he is trying to take his mind off the situation by reading entertaining material. But the distraction is short-lived, and his mind keeps returning to his difficult circumstances. Even so, Yitzhak still feels creative, though, not surprisingly, he is finding the writing slow going and difficult.
In the meantime, Yitzhak also worries also about his brother, Moshe, and his sister Heni and her family. Yitzhak has good reasons to worry about both siblings. Back in May 1917, Yitzhak reported that Moshe left the family in Novohrad Volinskyi and headed back to Dubno for his fitness examination for the Russian military. Whether he was mobilized then and what his fate was in the intervening months following the Bolshevik coup is not known from Yitzhak’s diary at this point.
Yitzhak also has good reason to be concerned about his sister Heni and her family who apparently made their way from Baranivka to Ekaterinoslav sometime between the end of Yitzhak’s third diary in May 1917 and the beginning of his fourth diary in January 1919. News has already reached Yitzhak in Lutsk of the many deaths following what he describes as a “Bolshevik” attack on the city at the end of December and its quick recapture by pro-Ukrainian forces. Historically, the attack was carried out by Makhno’s insurgent forces with local Bolshevik support, while the counterattack was by forces loyal to the Ukrainian People’s Republic.
Read the translation of January 25, 1919 or return to the top of the page.
***
A short entry in which Yitzhak describes the apathy that has come over him due to his fear of the external situation and the circulating rumors. Evoking the image of a “trembling leaf” before a storm, a metaphor that echoes a biblical passage from Job, Yitzhak describes how he can’t focus inwardly and instead remains constantly attuned to the outside. The only good news is that a letter arrived from family members also including a letter from his brother Moshe. This is the first indication in his diary that at least part of Yitzhak’s family had already returned to Mlynov. The letters indicate that Moshe and his sister Heni and her family were safe and sound in Ekaterinoslav, despite the attack there by the forces of the Ukrainian anarchist leader Nestor Makhno, whom Yitzhak describes as a group of murderers and robbers who “called themselves Bolsheviks.” Yitzhak still worries about them, though, because word has apparently reached him already that the Bolsheviks managed to drive out the Ukrainian People’s Republic (UPR) forces in late January.
Read the translation of February 2, 1919 or return to the top of the page.
***
Miserable in his current situation, Yitzhak describes himself as living in a thick fog of despair in which the external winds stir up suffocation and stench. His inner life has been overwhelmed by these external circumstances. Internally almost nothing engages him. He has only brief moments of creativity and respite. In passing, he mentions that he is fed up with his teaching work, though it is not clear here whether he is leaving his lodging to teach under the present situation. In describing his feelings, he identifies with a verse from Deuteronomy (28:67) from the curses that God promises will befall the Israelites if they do not remain faithful to God’s instruction. “In the evening I will say ‘if only it were morning’ and to morning [I will say] if only it were evening.” Is Yitzhak simply recalling a verse that does justice to his experience of despair, or does he mean to evoke the larger context of the passage and imply a deeper analogy between his current situation and the curses promised by God to Israel? Yitzhak does not say here.
Read the translation of February 9, 1919 or return to the top of the page.
***
Interpretations by Howard I. Schwartz
Updated: October 2025
Copyright © 2025 Howard I. Schwartz, PhD
Webpage Design by Howard I. Schwartz
Want to search for more information: JewishGen Home Page
Want to look at other Town pages: KehilaLinks Home Page
This page is hosted at no cost to the public by JewishGen,
Inc., a non-profit corporation. If it has been useful to you,
or if you are moved by the effort to preserve the memory of
our lost communities, your JewishGen-erosity
would be deeply appreciated.